How can seawalls be a poor choice for golf course erosion control?
Seawalls and fabric are both commonly used for erosion control around golf course lakes and ponds, but there are some important reasons why fabric may be a better choice in many cases.
Aesthetics: Seawalls can be unsightly and disrupt the natural aesthetic of a golf course. Fabric, on the other hand, can blend in with the surrounding landscape and maintain the natural look of the course.
Cost: Seawalls can be expensive to construct and maintain. Fabric, on the other hand, is often more cost-effective and less labor-intensive to install and maintain.
Effectiveness: Seawalls are not as effective as fabric at controlling erosion. Fabric is more flexible and conforms to the contours of the land, providing more complete coverage and preventing water from flowing around it.
Habitat: Seawalls can disrupt the natural habitat of the area, while fabric allows for better water infiltration and soil retention, which can support the growth of vegetation and promote the development of a diverse ecosystem.
Maintenance : Seawalls require regular maintenance and repair work. Fabric, on the other hand, is less likely to shift or wash away over time due to its promotion of vegetation growth, meaning that it will provide more consistent and long-lasting erosion control.
In conclusion, while seawalls are a common solution for erosion control around golf course lakes and ponds, fabric is generally a better choice due to its aesthetics, cost-effectiveness, effectiveness, ability to support vegetation and less maintenance required. It is important to consider the specific needs of a project and consult with a professional before making a decision on which erosion control method to use.
